We are pleased to be able to open our offices to clients and visitors once more as of 1 July 2020. All visits will be by appointment only.
To enable us to welcome you to the office in line with current Government advice, we have put strict guidelines in place to ensure the health and safety of our clients/visitors and our staff.
Please ensure you read our guidelines below BEFORE visiting our offices and follow them during your visit: Click here for full guidelinesClose
23 Jul 2019
Our client instructed a Firm of solicitors (not this Firm) to draft and complete a lease over commercial premises on St Mary’s Street, Cardiff City Centre. It transpired that the lease was granted to a non-existent, company tenant (Seafood Shack UK Ltd – “SSUK”).
The premises over which the lease was granted was actually occupied by Seafood Shack (Cardiff) Ltd (“SSCL”) and not SSUK. Long after “completion” of the lease to SSUK, a company called Seafood Shack Ltd (“SS”), the parent company of SSCL, tried to remedy what it claimed was a mistake in the original lease by way of a new lease. However, before a new lease was ever completed between our client and SS, SSCL (in occupation) was wound up. The liquidators of SSCL disclaimed any interest in the premises and our client peaceably re-entered the premises and changed the locks.
SS issued court proceedings against our client, claiming amongst other things, that it was entitled to possession of the premises and that our client had acted unlawfully in recovering possession of the premises.
The matters to be determined at Trial were whether:
a) on the true construction of the lease, SS was a party to the lease;
b) if rectification be required to show SS as a party to the lease, rectification ought to be granted;
c) the re-taking of possession of the premises by our client was lawful; and
d) SS is entitled to possession of the premises.
SS amended its claim a few months before Trial, claiming to be owed millions of pounds of damages by our client, but Directions to hear that issue were contingent on the result of the Trial to determine the above-listed matters.
The Judge held that:
This case highlights the importance of undertaking due diligence on the parties in a lease, or indeed the parties in any commercial transaction, at least by reference to records publically available at Companies House.
Harding Evans is a trading name of Harding Evans LLP, a limited liability partnership, registered in England & Wales (registered number: OC311802), authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA number: 419663).