Ken Thomas, medical negligence expert at Harding Evans answers
some key questions on making and pursuing a claim.
1. What is meant by clinical negligence?
The term covers any claim for compensation against the medical
profession, to include GPs, hospital doctors and nurses, dentists,
pharmacists and other healthcare professionals.
2. Could you give me some examples
A hospital casualty unit may have failed to detect a dislocated
shoulder or a surgical team negligently severed a nerve in theatre.
GPs may be negligent if they fail to refer a patient on for
specialist care soon enough or miss an obvious diagnosis. Dental
claims often arise for failure to properly treat decay whilst
pharmacists may be negligent if they give out a different drug to
that which was prescribed.
3. How many such claims are brought every year?
Definitive statistics are hard to come by. Surprisingly, there is no
central database of medical negligence claims. However, it is
estimated that in the UK over a million medical mistakes occur every
year in treating patients. Furthermore, it has been suggested that
thousands of patients die as a result of medical errors.
Unfortunately, funding difficulties in the NHS, and overstretched
staff, may well mean medical errors will continue to increase in
frequency.
Despite the media’s suggestion of a “compensation culture”, only a
tiny proportion of individuals injured by medical errors take legal
action. However, medical litigation can fulfil an important role in
ensuring the medical profession does all it can to meet the duty of
care owed to patients. Legal action can prevent the same error being
made again.
4. Is legal aid still available for these cases?
Yes. The potential claimant must satisfy two tests. Firstly they
must be financially eligible and secondly, they must have a claim
which stands a significant likelihood of succeeding. Only solicitors
who have a contract with the Legal Services Commission can act on
legally aided clinical negligence claims. Children will almost
always be financially eligible as their parents’ income and savings
are not taken into account.
5. What if I am not eligible? How else can I fund an
investigation and claim?
You may have the benefit of legal expenses insurance which could be
attached to any insurance policy you have, for instance home
contents. That insurer might fund your case at no cost to yourself.
“No Win, No Fee” arrangements are also available. However, again,
this is a difficult area of the law and you should ensure you seek
advice from a specialist solicitor experienced in handling these
claims. That should ideally be a solicitor who is on a recognised
panel of medical negligence solicitors.
6. What are the time limits for these claims?
Generally there is a three year rule. For adults, a claim must be
commenced at Court within three years of the alleged negligence or
the date when he or she learnt what had happened. With children, the
three years does not commence until their 18th birthday, so that a
child effectively has until their 21st birthday to commence Court
proceedings. Where an individual lacks mental capacity, (for example
cerebral palsy patients), then the time limit may not apply at all.
That said, these cases are often best investigated as soon as
possible after the events complained of.
7. How long do these cases take?
It very much depends upon the nature of the claim. A small case
involving a failure to detect a broken bone in casualty may only
take a few months. A high-value cerebral palsy claim may take
several years to investigate. However, generally these cases are now
being processed more quickly than used to be the case. There is, for
instance, in Wales a Pilot Scheme for certain cases against Welsh
hospitals to be progressed to a “speedy” timetable, and at a fixed
cost.
8. Is there any point in trying to bring a claim against the
medical profession? Don’t they all “close ranks”?
Whilst that may have been true in the past, it is very difficult for
that to happen now. Where a mistake has been made, then the hospital
or surgery that made the mistake usually nowadays respond, quite
openly, and explain what went wrong after carrying out its own
investigation. Moreover, in investigating these cases, independent
medical expert opinion can be secured on the part of the patient.
That means going to a medical expert outside of the local area and
asking him or her to assess the treatment received. That expert has
a Court imposed duty to be impartial – if they find that the care
offered has been negligent, they are duty bound to say so.
Healthcare professionals are now much more willing to acknowledge
and pinpoint medical errors than was true a generation ago.